G454

Brief Overview of ἄνοια (Strong's G454:)

The Greek word ἄνοια (ánoia) is a noun that translates to “foolishness” or “insanity.” It denotes a lack of understanding, reason, or mental clarity. In the New Testament, it is used to describe a state of mind characterized by irrationality or moral stupidity. The term suggests a deficiency in rational thought or judgement.

Welcome! As a scholar of Biblical keywords, you may like this discount on your next lexicon from Logos.

Detailed Overview

  1. Strong’s Concordance: According to Strong’s, ἄνοια (G454) is derived from the prefix ἀ- (a-, “without”) and νόησις (nóēsis, “understanding”), combining to mean “foolishness” or “lack of understanding.” Strong’s provides a basic definition but does not delve deeply into specific contexts or usage within the scriptures.
  2. Bauer-Danker-Arndt-Gingrich (BDAG) Greek-English Lexicon: BDAG defines ἄνοια as “foolishness” or “lack of understanding.” It is used to describe a state of irrationality or poor judgement. BDAG cites examples from the New Testament where this term is applied to highlight moral or intellectual deficiencies.
  3. Liddell-Scott-Jones (LSJ) Greek-English Lexicon: LSJ describes ἄνοια as “foolishness” or “insanity,” noting its usage in classical literature to describe a lack of reason or mental stability. The entry provides references to various contexts, including both classical and biblical uses, emphasizing its application to a state of mental or moral deficiency.
  4. Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon: Thayer’s defines ἄνοια as “foolishness,” “madness,” or “insanity.” It notes that the term is used to describe a state where reason and understanding are absent, particularly in moral or spiritual contexts. Thayer’s provides examples from the New Testament, showing how the term is used to critique lack of wisdom or rational thought.

In summary, ἄνοια (ánoia) refers to a state of foolishness or insanity, characterized by a lack of rational thought or understanding. Strong’s Concordance, BDAG, LSJ, and Thayer’s all agree on its application to describe intellectual or moral deficiencies, with each source contributing additional context and examples from both classical and biblical literature.

guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments