G1895

Introduction

Understanding Greek words in Biblical studies is crucial for unlocking the deeper meanings of the New Testament texts. The Greek word ἐπειδήπερ (transliterated as “epeidēper”) is particularly significant due to its use in expressing strong causal relationships. This word is key to interpreting certain passages in the New Testament and provides insight into the way ancient Greeks structured logical arguments and narratives. By studying words like ἐπειδήπερ, readers can gain a more nuanced understanding of ancient texts and their intended messages.

Key Information

Save 20% with code – FOG20

• Greek Word: ἐπειδήπερ (epeidēper) [eh-pey-DEE-per]
• Etymology Root Words and Meanings:
• Composed of ἐπεί (epei), meaning “since” or “after,” δή (dē), an emphatic particle meaning “indeed” or “certainly,” and περ (per), which adds emphasis. The combination results in a meaning akin to “since indeed” or “seeing that.”
• Part of Speech: Conjunction
• Grammatical Details: Used as a subordinating conjunction, typically to introduce a highly emphatic causal clause.
• The F.O.G Word Choice: Coming Soon.

Primary Meanings

• “Since indeed”
• “Seeing that”
• “Because truly”
• “Given that”

Similar Words:
The Greek word ἐπειδή (epeidē) is closely related to ἐπειδήπερ. While both words express causality, ἐπειδήπερ adds an even stronger emphasis to the reason or cause. Another related word is διότι (dioti), which also means “because,” but is used more for logical or reasoned explanations rather than emphatic statements.

Further Insights:
The word ἐπειδήπερ is an emphatic conjunction that intensifies the causal relationship between two clauses. It does not inflect, remaining the same regardless of its position or the clauses it connects. Its rarity in the New Testament emphasizes its use in contexts where the author wants to highlight an indisputable reason.
Click here for a beginner’s guide to reading Greek.

Lexicon Insights

BDAG:
The BDAG lexicon defines ἐπειδήπερ as a conjunction used to strongly assert a reason or cause. It suggests translation as “since indeed” or “because truly,” highlighting that its usage in ancient texts was often for emphatic emphasis.

Thayers:
Thayer’s lexicon notes that ἐπειδήπερ is similar to ἐπειδή but with an added level of intensity. It is employed in passages where the reason provided is particularly convincing or undeniable.

Vines:
Vines Expository Dictionary indicates that ἐπειδήπερ is rarely used in the New Testament due to its intense emphasis. When it appears, it denotes a causal statement with a high degree of certainty and persuasion.

LSJ:
The Liddell-Scott-Jones (LSJ) lexicon describes ἐπειδήπερ as being more emphatic than ἐπειδή, suggesting a translation akin to “seeing that indeed.” It is noted for its emphasis in argumentative or rhetorical contexts in classical Greek literature.

Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance:
Strong’s Concordance lists ἐπειδήπερ as a conjunction meaning “since indeed” or “because truly.” It underscores its role in connecting clauses where the cause is not just stated but stressed as undeniable.

Related Scripture References

• Luke 1:1: “Forasmuch as (ἐπειδήπερ) many have taken in hand to set forth in order a declaration of those things which are most surely believed among us…”

Classical Usage

Summary of ἐπειδήπερ (G1895)

The Greek conjunction ἐπειδήπερ (epeidēper) is a powerful tool in the arsenal of biblical and classical Greek authors. Its primary meanings, such as “since indeed” and “because truly,” convey strong causal relationships that emphasize the reasons or justifications for a statement or action. The rarity and intensity of ἐπειδήπερ highlight its unique role in Greek literature, making it essential for those studying biblical texts or ancient Greek rhetoric. Understanding its use and implications can offer readers a deeper insight into the intentions behind the texts and the logic that underpins them.

Did You Know?

Did you know that the word ἐπειδήπερ is one of the rarest causal conjunctions used in the New Testament? Its rarity suggests that it was reserved for moments where the author wanted to emphasize the undeniable nature of the reason being provided, adding a layer of intensity to the argument.