Got a Minute extra for God?
Has anyone ever told you: יהוה (Yahweh) God loves you and has a great plan for your life?
Has anyone ever told you: יהוה (Yahweh) God loves you and has a great plan for your life?
Strong’s G4508: Derived from ῥύπος (filth), ῥυπαρός describes that which is physically dirty, morally unclean, or shabby in appearance. In James’ epistle, it specifically refers to wearing filthy clothing, metaphorically representing spiritual and moral impurity, highlighting social and spiritual distinctions within the early church community.
The term ῥυπαρός carries both literal and metaphorical significance in New Testament usage. Primarily denoting physical filthiness or dirtiness, it extends beyond mere physical appearance to encompass moral and spiritual uncleanliness. In early church contexts, the word became particularly significant in discussions of spiritual purity and social equality within Christian communities. James employs this term to challenge discriminatory practices based on outward appearances, particularly regarding wealth and social status. The word’s usage in James 2:2 serves as a powerful critique of showing favoritism within the church, emphasizing that external appearances should not determine one’s worth or treatment in God’s assembly. This understanding remains deeply relevant today as churches continue to grapple with issues of discrimination and social prejudice.
Every word in the Bible has depths of meaning & beauty for you to explore. Welcome to Phase 1 of the F.O.G Bible project: Building an expanded Strong’s Concordance. What is the F.O.G?
Etymology:
For compound words:
While not a compound word, the adjectival suffix -αρος transforms the noun ῥύπος (filth) into an adjective describing the quality of being filthy.
Translation Options:
Morphological features as an adjective:
Examples of morphological changes:
Cross-references:
BDAG presents ῥυπαρός primarily as describing physical dirt and shabby clothing, while acknowledging its metaphorical extension to moral uncleanliness. Thayer’s emphasizes the word’s connection to moral impurity and its use in social contexts. LSJ provides evidence of the term’s usage in classical Greek literature, particularly in describing physical filth and poor condition. Vine’s expands on the metaphorical implications, especially in James’ usage. Strong’s connects it to the root word ῥύπος, while LEH provides Septuagint parallels. Moulton and Milligan offer papyrological evidence of its use in describing worn or shabby clothing in everyday contexts.
First appearance:
For if a man comes into your assembly with a gold ring and dressed in fine clothes, and there also comes in a poor man in filthy clothes (James 2:2)
Additional References:
Revelation 22:11
Author: Work | Text |
---|---|
Aristophanes: Peace | “The man appeared wearing filthy garments, unlike his usual attire” |
Plato: Republic | “The soul becomes dirty through association with evil deeds” |
Plutarch: Moralia | “They lived in squalid conditions, showing no care for cleanliness” |
The word ῥυπαρός powerfully illustrates how external appearances often mask deeper spiritual realities. James uses this term to challenge the church’s tendency to judge based on outward appearance, reminding us that in Christ, such distinctions should not determine our treatment of others. This word proclaims the good news that King Jesus looks not at the outward appearance but at the heart, and through His cleansing work, we are made clean regardless of our social status or external condition.
Strong’s G4508: Derived from ῥύπος (filth), ῥυπαρός describes that which is physically dirty, morally unclean, or shabby in appearance. In James’ epistle, it specifically refers to wearing filthy clothing, metaphorically representing spiritual and moral impurity, highlighting social and spiritual distinctions within the early church community.
Part of speech: Adjective
Tags: filthy, unclean, moral impurity, physical dirt, poverty, social status, discrimination, James epistle, spiritual cleansing, baptism symbolism
Note: While this entry strives for accuracy, readers engaged in critical research should verify citations and keyword occurrences in their Bible translation of choice. For Biblical citations, the F.O.G Bible project recommends Logos Bible software.
Add your first comment to this post