Brief Overview of Ἀντιπατρίς (Strong’s G494)

The Greek word Ἀντιπατρίς (Antipatris) is a proper noun referring to a specific location in the ancient world. It denotes a city mentioned in the New Testament, specifically in Acts 23:31, where it is described as a stopping point on the route between Jerusalem and Caesarea. The name is derived from the Greek words “ἀντί” (anti), meaning “against” or “in place of,” and “πατρίς” (patris), meaning “fatherland” or “country.”

Detailed Overview

1. Strong’s Concordance: Strong’s defines Ἀντιπατρίς as a proper noun referring to a city situated on the road between Jerusalem and Caesarea. The city was used as a staging point for Paul during his journey to Caesarea, as mentioned in Acts 23:31. The name combines the Greek roots “ἀντί” (anti) and “πατρίς” (patris), but the specific connotation of “Antipatris” is less about the literal translation and more about its historical and geographical significance.
2. Bauer-Danker-Arndt-Gingrich (BDAG) Greek-English Lexicon: BDAG provides additional context for Ἀντιπατρίς, noting its geographical placement and historical significance. The lexicon highlights its role as an important location in the travel narrative of Paul, marking a significant waypoint in the journey from Jerusalem to Caesarea.
3. Liddell-Scott-Jones (LSJ) Greek-English Lexicon: LSJ offers a detailed entry for Ἀντιπατρίς, confirming its role as a geographical location in ancient Palestine. It emphasizes the city’s importance as a stopping point on the journey between major cities in the region and provides historical context regarding its use in travel routes.
4. Thayer’s Greek-English Lexicon: Thayer’s confirms that Ἀντιπατρίς is a proper noun referring to a city mentioned in Acts 23:31. It notes the city’s function as a significant location in the context of Paul’s journey, providing a brief overview of its geographical importance.

In summary, Ἀντιπατρίς (Antipatris) is a proper noun referring to a city located on the route between Jerusalem and Caesarea, mentioned in Acts 23:31. Strong’s, BDAG, LSJ, and Thayer’s all recognize its historical and geographical significance, with the name combining Greek roots related to “place” and “country” but primarily understood through its role in the New Testament narrative.