Brief Overview of διάδοχος (G1240: diádochos)

Transliteration: diádochos (pronounced dee-AH-doh-khos)
Part of Speech: Masculine noun

The Greek word διάδοχος (diádochos) is a masculine noun that derives from the combination of the preposition διά (diá, meaning “through” or “across”) and the verb δέχομαι (déchomai, meaning “to receive” or “to accept”). The term diádochos essentially means “successor” or “one who receives in succession.” It refers to a person who takes over a position, role, or responsibility from another, often in a formal or official capacity. This word emphasizes the orderly transfer of authority or responsibility, ensuring continuity and stability in various contexts, such as leadership or inheritance.

Scripture References

The term diádochos appears in the New Testament in the following verse:

•   Acts 24:27 (NIV): “When two years had passed, Felix was succeeded by Porcius Festus, but because Felix wanted to grant a favor to the Jews, he left Paul in prison.”

In this verse, the concept of diádochos is directly reflected in the transition of authority from Felix to his successor, Porcius Festus, as governor.

Detailed Lexicon Description

BDAG (Bauer-Danker-Arndt-Gingrich) defines diádochos as a noun meaning “successor” or “one who follows in office or position.” The lexicon highlights the term’s application in contexts where leadership or authority is transferred from one person to another, particularly in royal or political settings. BDAG emphasizes that diádochos is frequently used in historical narratives, especially concerning the succession of kings and rulers in the ancient world.

Thayer’s Greek Lexicon similarly defines diádochos as “a successor,” with a particular focus on royal or leadership succession. Thayer’s notes that the term is closely associated with the idea of inheritance, where a position or role is passed down to a designated individual, ensuring continuity within a ruling dynasty or political office.

LSJ (Liddell-Scott-Jones) provides a broader definition of diádochos, including its use in intellectual traditions, where the term might refer to a successor of a philosophical school or a follower who continues the teachings of a predecessor. This highlights the term’s versatility in both political and academic contexts.

Usage in Classical Greek Literature

1.  Plutarch, Lives (Alexander) - Plutarch uses diádochos to describe the successors of Alexander the Great, known as the Diadochi, who were his generals and eventually divided his empire among themselves after his death. This usage exemplifies the term’s application in political and military contexts, emphasizing the orderly transfer of power.
2.  Polybius, Histories - In Polybius’ historical accounts, diádochos is used to describe individuals who inherit leadership roles, particularly in the context of dynastic succession in the Hellenistic kingdoms following Alexander the Great’s empire. This further illustrates the term’s relevance in historical and political narratives.
3.  Xenophon, Anabasis - Xenophon employs diádochos in a more general sense, referring to individuals who succeed others in various positions, not limited to royalty but extending to other forms of leadership and command within the context of military expeditions.

Support our Israeli friends

Use code: FOG20 for a 20% discount.

Learn More

Summary

The Greek word diádochos (G1240) carries the meaning of “successor” or “one who receives in succession,” with a particular emphasis on the transfer of authority or responsibility from one person to another. This term, derived from the roots διά (diá) and δέχομαι (déchomai), is used primarily in contexts involving leadership succession, whether in political, royal, or intellectual settings. The term appears in the New Testament in Acts 24:27, where it refers to the succession of the Roman governor Felix by Porcius Festus. The word is also prevalent in classical Greek literature, where it describes the orderly transfer of power among rulers, commanders, and even philosophical leaders. In sum, diádochos underscores the importance of continuity and stability in leadership and governance throughout history and within the biblical context.